Bourgain ’ s Theorem
نویسنده
چکیده
Exercise 1. Show that distances between sets do not necessarily satisfy the triangle inequality. That is, it is possible that d(S1, S2) + d(S2, S3) > d(S1, S3) for some sets S1, S2 and S3. Exercise 2. Prove that d(x, y) ≥ d(S, x)− d(S, y) and thus d(x, y) ≥ |d(S, x)− d(S, y)|. Proof. Fix ε > 0. Let y′ ∈ S be such that d(y′, y) ≤ d(S, y) + ε (if S is a finite set, there is y′ ∈ S s.t. d(y, y′) = d(S, y)). Then d(x, S) ≤ d(x, y′) ≤ d(x, y) + d(y, y′) ≤ d(x, y) + d(S, y) + ε. We proved that d(x, S) ≤ d(x, y) + d(S, y) + ε for every ε > 0. Therefore, d(x, S) ≤ d(x, y) + d(S, y).
منابع مشابه
Revisiting the Bourgain-tzafriri Restricted Invertibility Theorem
We will give some new techniques for working with problems surrounding the Bourgain-Tzafriri Restricted Invertibility Theorem. First we show that the parameters which work in the theorem for all ‖T‖ ≤ 2 √ 2 closely approximate the parameters which work for all operators. This yields a generalization of the theorem which simultaneously does restricted invertibility on a small partition of the ve...
متن کاملDecomposition of S1-valued maps in Sobolev spaces
Let n ≥ 2, s > 0, p ≥ 1 be such that 1 ≤ sp < 2. We prove that for each map u ∈W s,p(Sn;S1) one can find φ ∈ W s,p(Sn;R) and v ∈ W sp,1(Sn;S1) such that u = ve. This yields a decomposition of u into a part that has a lifting in W , e, and a map "smoother" than u but without lifting, namely v. Our result generalizes a previous one of Bourgain and Brezis (which corresponds to the case s = 1/2, p ...
متن کاملSUM - PRODUCT PHENOMENA IN F p : A BRIEF INTRODUCTION
These notes arose from my Cambridge Part III course on Additive Combinatorics, given in Lent Term 2009. The aim was to understand the simplest proof of the Bourgain-Glibichuk-Konyagin bounds for exponential sums over subgroups. As a byproduct one obtains a clean proof of the Bourgain-Katz-Tao theorem on the sumproduct phenomenon in Fp. The arguments are essentially extracted from Bourgain’s pap...
متن کاملAdvanced Approximation Algorithms ( CMU 15 - 854 B , Spring 2008 ) Lecture 20 : Embeddings into Trees and L 1 Embeddings March 27 2008
where c(E(S, S̄)) is the sum of the weights of the edges that cross the cut, and D(S, S̄) is the sum of the demands of the pairs (si, ti) that are separated by the cut. We recall that optimizing over the set of cuts is equivalent to optimizing over `1 metrics, and is NP-hard. Instead, we may optimize over the set of all metrics. In this lecture, we bound the gap introduced by this relaxation by s...
متن کاملBreaking the k Barrier for Explicit RIP Matrices
Jean Bourgain School of Mathematics Institute for Advanced Study Princeton, NJ 08540 [email protected] S. J. Dilworth Department of Mathematics University of South Carolina Columbia, SC 29208 [email protected] Kevin Ford Department of Mathematics University of Illinois Urbana, IL 61801 [email protected] Sergei V. Konyagin Steklov Mathematical Institute 8 Gubkin Street Moscow, 119991, Ru...
متن کاملRoth’s Theorem on Progressions Revisited
This paper is a sequel to [B]. Our main result is an improvement of the density condition for a subset A ⊂ {1,. .. , N } to contain a nontrivial arithmetic progression of length 3. More specifically, we prove the following Theorem 1. (0.1) δ ≫ (log log N) 2 (log N) 2/3 (N assumed sufficiently large), then A contains nontrivial progressions of length 3.
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2015